H808 Core Activity 5.4

I find myself agreeing with you, Eugene, on your conclusions about Learning Technologists.

Here is my picture of what has been going on in education. We have an established group of professionals, teachers/academics, who find themselves in situ when the biggest revolution of the modern era comes onto the scene - information technology, and its partner revolution, the internet/www.

What becomes obvious to pioneering distance educators such as the OU, is that this new medium (internet) and tools (IT) can transform the way learning is delivered. The potential of this medium is seized upon by management, but the implications of this new direction have to be delivered by the institution. Since teachers and academics are/were totally unqualified to operate in this new digital domain, someone needed to fill the gap - enter a brand new person, the learning technologist. I see this person (under 35, technologically qualified) as being the bridge between the teachers and the IT experts; someone who knows enough about IT AND enough about the specific learning situation to recommend/provide tools, platforms and support wisely.

Incidentally, this same digital transformation is going on in (every?) professional discipline today. Spreadsheets have transformed the job of accountants, CADCAM technology has transformed the job of design engineers, Enterprise Resource Planning systems have transformed the job of production planning engineers and purchasing professionals. So is education any different, or does every profession have its own equivalent of the learning technologist?

Others will have their own opinion about this, but I suspect that the individual focus of the learning process makes the job of the learning technologist much more specialised than that of an IT service provider to other professions. And, let's say that there is a separate and important professionalism called a learning technologist, is it simply a matter of time before the next generation (digital native) teachers and academics with a much more instintive feel for technology will gradually incorporate the role of learning technologist into their own role?

In my own practice, we use Tom Peters' (1999) model of Professional Service, one key element of which positions the job of a Professional Service as being one in which the Professional educates their client to be able to serve themselves. In the meantime, the Professional is developing themself to the next level, and is in a position to serve their client once again at the next level of competence.

This is a long winded way of saying that I think there will always be a role for learning technologists, but any professional accreditation that they establish must be about being the experts on what next, not what is.

Madeleine



Peters, T. (1999) Reinventing Work, the Professional Service Firm 50, Alfred A Knopf Inc, New York